Taras Kuzio's piece on whether Smeshko deserves all the credit for saving Ukraine that the New York Times has given him, in the Jamestown Foundation's Eurasia Daily Monitor.
I strongly agree with Kuzio's very obvious conclusion:
The credit for this should go to Yushchenko and Ukraine's Orange Revolution protestors who practiced non-violence.
But I couldn't concentrate on the piece well enough after reading this, four paragraphs down the piece:
Nevertheless, four factors work against the New York Times expose's ability to improve the image of SBU chief Ihor Smeshko. Already allegations have been raised that the article was merely a public relations exercise for Smeshko (oligarch.net, January 20).
Oligarch.net? What kind of source is that? I followed the link and found myself at some weird, obscure place, which had nothing to do with Ukraine.
Maybe it's a typo - or maybe it's the SBU taking revenge on Kuzio.